<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Zarick &#187; seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewzarick.com/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewzarick.com</link>
	<description>Interactive Marketing Professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The SEO Value of a Shared Twitter Link</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewzarick.com/the-seo-value-of-a-shared-twitter-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewzarick.com/the-seo-value-of-a-shared-twitter-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewzarick.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter continues to be a hot topic of discussion not only among  interactive marketing agencies and tech geeks, but also among the  mainstream media and traditional marketers. There is no doubt that  Twitter is a tremendously powerful tool for increasing brand awareness  through its incredible reach, but recently I began wondering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter continues to be a hot topic of discussion not only among  interactive marketing agencies and tech geeks, but also among the  mainstream media and traditional marketers. There is no doubt that  Twitter is a tremendously powerful tool for increasing brand awareness  through its incredible reach, but recently I began wondering about the SEO value of the platform in addition to being a driver of brand  visibility.</p>
<p><span id="more-19"></span></p>
<p>I am definitely not the first person to have written on this subject  and surely not the last. However, recently I experienced the SEO value  of Twitter first-hand and felt compelled to share my findings.  Unfortunately I don’t have hard evidence to support the following  claims, but I do have several theories as to how Twitter has directly  added SEO value to a web property that I directly manage.</p>
<p>First, it is important to put Twitter’s direct effect on SEO value  into perspective.</p>
<p>As many SEO Strategists have noted, the most popular URL shortening  services including <a href="http://tinyurl.com/">TinyURL</a> and <a href="http://bit.ly/">Bit.ly</a> both use 301-redirects (permanent redirects) which tell the search  engine spiders to both index and pass link value to webpages sent in  Tweets with URL shorteners. This is a great thing! However, the downside  is that Twitter utilizes the nofollow attribute on user submitted  hyperlinks which tells search engine spiders to ignore the hyperlinks.  Yahoo! and Google search spiders follow nofollow links, but exclude the  links from their ranking calculations. MSN (Is it cool to call MSN Bing  now?) ignores these links completely. Simply put, links shared on  Twitter will not be counted as added backlinks for your website in three  of the four major search engines &#8211; Yahoo!, Google and MSN.</p>
<p><strong>So what is the SEO value of Twitter? </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ask.com/">Ask.com</a> passes link value on Twitter! Woohoo. <a href="http://www.ask.com/">Ask.com</a> follows links using the nofollow attribute. Many people are quick to  write off <a href="http://www.ask.com/">Ask.com</a> as a major player in search. Why care about a search engine that has  just under 4% search market share? Well, it is important to remember  that a 4% market share is equivalent to about 375 million search queries  per month. Depending on your company’s vertical, this could translate  into a fairly significant volume of traffic to your website.</p>
<p>More importantly, though, is the added usage data to your website  from Twitter users. There has been speculation that <a href="http://www.bestrank.com/blog/usage-data-and-googles-analytics-influencing-organic-traffic">search  engines factor in usage data </a>when weighting the overall quality of  your website, which ultimately effects your rankings. However, last year  <a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/001624.shtml">Google  down played this speculation</a>. But with the rise of shared links  across social media platforms, I struggle to believe that usage data  plays no role in how a website ranks. Examples of usage data variables  include referring sites, number of unique visitors, number of page  views, time on site and bounce rate. These variables are effected each  time you share a link on Twitter and drive new visitors to your website.  This is why it continues to be important to know your audience. If you  know your audience and know that the content you are sharing from your  website appeals to them, you will have favorable usage data. Google in  particular has access to this data not only through Google Analytics,  but also from users who have downloaded the Google Toolbar and Google  Web Accelerator. There has also been speculation that other search  engines purchase <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clickstream">clickstream  data</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> I prefer to use Bit.ly to track how a given  link has been shared across Twitter. Simply add a plus sign to the end  of any Bit.ly link to see the URLs analytics. Example: <a href="http://bit.ly/cxIRl+" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/cxIRl+</a></p>
<p>Perhaps the greatest SEO value that Twitter has on any given webpage  happens without you even realizing it. There are countless services that  monitor Twitter for links and then aggregate the links in real-time.  Many of the most well-known Twitter link aggregators, such as <a href="http://tweetmeme.com/">Tweetmeme</a> and <a href="http://twitturly.com/">Twitturly</a>,  rank links based on how many times those links have been shared on  Twitter. In other words, Digg-style votes come in the form of tweets or  retweets of a link. Not only do some of these aggregators send  significant traffic, but many of them do not add the nofollow attribute  to the links they aggregate &#8211; meaning they pass link value to your  website. This is not to say that all such aggregators and applications  that monitor Twitter for content don’t utilize the nofollow, but there  are countless websites that monitor Twitter for content that pass link  value.</p>
<p><strong>Share Content!</strong></p>
<p>While Twitter itself doesn’t have much direct SEO value, the  secondary effects of added usage data and passed link value from third  party websites are worth paying attention to. Share relevant content  that you know your audience will appreciate and share with their  followers. As always, content is king!</p>
<p>For further reading on <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/04/the-power-of-passed-links.html">The  Power of Passed Links</a> through social media, Fred Wilson has some  great data.</p>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="http://www.thejargroup.com/the-seo-value-of-a-shared-twitter-link/">The JAR  Group blog</a> in July of 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewzarick.com/the-seo-value-of-a-shared-twitter-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
